MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRONIC LEARNING PERFORMANCE USING THE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) METHOD AT THE VOCATIONAL SCHOOL OF PATRIA GADINGREJO

Eko Hendrawan(1), Suhendro Yusuf Irianto(2), Fitria Fitria(3),


(1) Department of Information System, STMIK Pringsewu, Lampung
(2) Postgraduate Program in Informatics Engineering IIB Darmajaya, Lampung
(3) Postgraduate Program in Informatics Engineering IIB Darmajaya, Lampung
Corresponding Author

Abstract


The application of electronic learning is carried out in the learning process at Patria Gadingrejo Vocational School to determine the factors that are still weak or require improvement and the factors that are considered successful or strong in assisting the application of electronic learning in the learning process. This study results in Aydin and Tasci's ELR model questionnaire consisting of 37 statements grouped into four factors. These factors are human, self-development, technology, and innovation as well as six questions for the perception of the usefulness of electronic learning. The location of this research is at Patria Gadingrejo Vocational School. Respondents in this study were the principal, vice principal of the curriculum section, the school treasurer, the person in charge of the school computer laboratory, and teachers who are experts in e-learning. Data processing is carried out to examine the factors that influence the perceived usefulness of e-learning by using regression analysis and also the level of readiness for the application of electronic learning at Patria Gadingrejo Vocational School with Aydin and Tasci's ELR model. Aydin & Tasci's electronic learning readiness (ELR) model applied to Patria Gadingrejo Vocational School gives results that are not ready for the application of electronic learning and requires a slight improvement.


Keywords


TAM, ELR, E-learning

References


Ade Kusmana. (2011). E-learning dalam Pembelajaran. Lentera Pendidikan Vol 14 No.1 Juni 2011.Hlm 35 51.http://ejurnal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/artikel/03% 20E-Learning%20dalam%20Pembelajaran%20 %20Ade%20Kusmana.pdf

Ahmad Johari Sihes. (2010). Konsep Pembelajaran. eprints.utm.my/10357/1/ bab10.pdf. Diakses tanggal 20 Juni 2016, Pukul 20.00 WIB.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Ed Revisi VI,. Penerbit PT Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.

Arif Kurniawan, (2014). Pengukuran Tingkat Kesiapan Penerapan E-Learning Sekolah Menengah Atas Muhammadiyah Di Kota Yogyakarta. Skripsi Program Matematikan UNY. Diakses tanggal 18 Agustus 2016, Pukul 21.00 WIB.

Andi Kristanto. (2003). Jaringan Komputer. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Aydin, Cengiz Hakan & Tasci D. (2005). Measuring Readiness for e-Learning: Reflections from an Emerging country. Educational Technology&Society, 8(4). Hlm 244-257.http://www.ifets.info/journals/8_4/22.pdf. Diakses tanggal 6 Mei 2016, Pukul 11.05 WIB.

Bakardjieva, Teodora. (2011). Introduction to Computer Networking. http://vfu.bg/en/e-Learning/Computer-Networks Introduction_Computer_Networking.pdf. Diakses tanggal 20 Juni 2016, Pukul 20.00 WIB.

Broadbent, B. (2001). Tips to help decide if your organization is ready for e-learning. http://wwwicde.net/en/arshive/articles/012.htm. Diakses tanggal 20 Juni 2016, Pukul 20.00 WIB.

Budhiraja, Renu & Sameer Sachdeva. (2002). E-readiness Assessment (India). http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/ UNPAN014673.pdf. Diakses pada 19 Juni 2016, Pukul 20.56 WIB.

Cholid Narbuko, H. Abu Achmadi. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian: memberikan Bekal teoritis pada mahasiswa tentang metodologi penelitian serta diharapkan dapat melaksanakan penelitian dengan langkah-langkah yang benar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Grendi Hendrastomo. (2008). Dilema dan Tantangan Pembelajaran E-learning. http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/132318574/Dilema%20dan%20Tan tangan%20Pembelajaran%20Elearning%20ok.pdf.Diakses tanggal 6 Maret 2016, Pukul 13.47 WIB.

Hamzah, dkk. (2010). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Dengan Metode Balanced Scorecard (Studi Kasus: Universitas Respati Yogyakarta). Seminar Nasional Informatika 2010 (semnasIF 2010 UPN ”Veteran” Yogyakarta, 22 Mei 2016. ) ISSN: 1979-2328

Haney, D. (2002). Assesing Organiztional Readiness for E-learning: 70 Questions to Ask. Performance Improvement Vol 41 No.4 April 2002. Hlm 10-15. http://www.qou.edu/english/scientificResearch/eLearningResearchs/assess

ingOrganizational.pdf. Diakses tanggal 25 Januari 2016, Pukul 20.41 WIB.

Priyanto. (2008). Model E-Learning Readiness Sebagai Strategi Pengembangan E-Learning. International Seminar Proceedings, Information And Communication Technology (ICT) In Education. The Graduate School.Yogyakarta State University. Diakses tanggal 02 April 2017, Pukul 20.00 WIB.

Rosenberg, Marc J. (2001). Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age.United States of America: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations(5th Ed). New York: Free.

Rusman, Deni Kurniawan, dan Cepi Riyana. (2012). Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi: Mengembangkan Profesionalitas Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Rusman, Deni Kurniawan, dan Cepi Riyana. (2012). Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi: Mengembangkan Profesionalitas Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Schank, Roger C. (2002). Designing wolrd class e-learning. United States of America: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Schubert, Petra & Daniel Risch. (2006). Collaborative Electronic Commence Technology and Research. Nortwestern Switzerland: University of Applied Sciences Nortwestern Switzerland FHNW.

Sugiyono (2007). Statistik untuk Penelitian. CV Alfa Beta: Bandung.

The Division of Information Technology BHUTAN. (2003). E-Readiness Assessement Final Report. http://www.unapcict.org/ecohub/resources/ bhutan-e-readiness-assessment-final-report/at_download/attachment1. Diakses tanggal 19 Februari 2016, Pukul 21.49 WIB.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 277 times
PDF Download : 89 times

DOI: 10.56327/jurnaltam.v12i1.1029

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.