ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF MENDELEY USING THE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) APPROACH: STUDY IN STUDENTS OF OFFICE ADMINISTRATION EDUCATION IN SURABAYA STATE UNIVERSITY
(1) Prodi Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur
(2) Prodi Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
References
S. I. A. Dwiningrum, Ilmu sosial & budaya dasar. Yogyakarta: UNY Press, 2012.
H. A. Fitriana and A. O. P. Dewi, “Pengaruh Pengajaran Mendeley Reference Management Software Terhadap Ketepatan Penulisan Sitasi dan Daftar Referensi (Studi Eksperimental Mahasiswa Prodi S-1 Ilmu Perpustakaan Angkatan 2014 Universitas Diponegoro),” J. Ilmu Perpust., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 241–250, 2019.
S. Hannabuss, “Contested Texts: issues of plagiarism,” Libr. Manag., vol. 22, no. 6/7, pp. 311–318, 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005595.
S. Ovadia, “Managing Citations with Cost-Free Tools Managng Citations with Cost-Free Tools,” Behav. Soc. Sci. Libr., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 107–111, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2011.565408.
E. D. Udayanti and F. A. Nugroho, “Analisa Minat Penggunaan Aplikasi TB eScoring dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” Edu Komputika J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/edukomputika.v5i1.23331.
S. B. Hermanto and Patmawati, “Determinan Penggunaan Aktual Perangkat Lunak Akuntansi Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model,” J. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 67–81, 2017, doi: 10.9744/jak.19.2.67-81.
I. I. P. Heryani, M. Simanjuntak, and A. Maulana, “Perilaku Penggunaan Internet Banking Sebagai Alat Transaksi Finansial,” J. Apl. Bisnis dan Manaj., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 86–95, 2020, doi: 10.17358/jabm.6.1.86.
H. A. Kurniawati, W. A. Winarno, and A. Arif, “Analisis Minat Penggunaan Mobile Banking Dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Yang Telah Dimodifikasi,” e-Journal Ekon. Bisnis dan Akunt., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.19184/ejeba.v4i1.4563.
E. B. Diop, S. Zhao, and T. Van Duy, “An extension of the technology acceptance model for understanding travelers’ adoption of variable message signs,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1–17, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216007.
N. M. A. P. Dewi and I. G. K. Warmika, “Peran Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, Persepsi Manfaat Dan Persepsi Resiko Terhadap Niat Menggunakan Mobile Commerce Di Kota Denpasar,” E-Jurnal Manaj., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2606–2636, 2016.
H. Zaugg, I. Tateishi, D. L. Randall, and R. E. West, “Mendeley: Creating Communities of Scholarly Inquiry Through Research Collaboration,” TechTrends, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 32–36, 2011, doi: DOI: 10.1007/s11528-011-0467-y.
Y. Zhang, “Comparison of Select Reference Management Tools,” Med. Ref. Serv., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2012.641841.
F. S. Rahayu, D. Budiyanto, and D. Palyama, “Analisis Penerimaan e-Learning Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Studi Kasus: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta),” JUTEI (Jurnal Terap. Teknol. Informasi), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 87–98, 2017, doi: 10.21460/jutei.2017.12.20.
M. R. Saras, Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Penggunaan E-Learning Moodle Oleh Guru Smk Negeri 2 Yogyakarta Dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2016.
F. D. Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts,” Int. J. Man. Mach. Stud., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 475–487, 1993, doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022.
Nursiah, “Pengaruh Perceived Ease of Use dan Perceived Usefullnes Terhadap Behavioral Intention to Use,” J. Elektron. Sist. Inf. dan Komput., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 39–47, 2017.
M. G. Aboelmaged and T. R. Gebba, “Mobile Banking Adoption: An Examination of Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior,” Int. J. Bus. Res. Dev., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35–50, 2013.
F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefullness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Q., vol. 13, no. 3, 1989, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
R. Aditya and A. Wardhana, “Pengaruh Perceived Usefulness dan Perceived Ease of Use Terhadap Behavioral Intention dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Pada Pengguna Instant Messaging Line di Indonesia,” J. Siasat Bisnis, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol20.iss1.art1.
S. Alharbi and S. Drew, “Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academics’ Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Management Systems,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 143–155, 2014, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2014.050120.
A. S. Hussein, “Penelitian Bisnis dan Manajemen Menggunakan Partial Least Squares (PLS) dengan SmartPLS 3.0,” Jurusan Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya, 2015.
N. Urbanch and F. Ahlemann, “Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares,” J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 5–40, 2010.
B. I. Harahap, M. Nazer, and F. Andrianus, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Loyalitas Konsumen Dalam Belanja Online Di Kota Solok,” J. TAM (Technology Accept. Model., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020.
J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet,” J. Mark. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2011, doi: DOI: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error:algebra and statistics,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 382–388, 1981.
I. Ghozali and H. Latan, Partial Least Squares: Konsep, teknik, dan aplikasi menggunakan program smart PLS 3.0, 2nd ed. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, 2015.
P. A. A. Sana, S. N. W. Sri, Y. N. N. Kerti, and S. I. P. Gde, “Technology Acceptance Model and Trust in Explaining Customer Intention to Use Internet Banking,” Russ. J. Agric. Socio-Economic Sci., vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 254–262, 2019, doi: 10.18551/rjoas.2019-07.29.
K. Juhri and C. K. Dewi, “Kepercayaan dan penerimaan layanan mobile money t-cash di Bandung dengan pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” J. Pro Bisnis, vol. 10, no. 1, 2017.
Z. Hussein, “Leading to Intention:The Role of Attitude in Relation to Technology Acceptance Model in E-Learning,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 105, pp. 159–164, 2015.
I. K. Sumerta, I. G. P. A. Widyagoca, A. M. Adiandari, and P. G. D. Herlambang, “Analysis of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Use E-Money in Bali Province,” Int. J. Adv. Trends Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 1.5, pp. 206–211, 2019, doi: 10.30534/ijatcse/2019/3881.52019.
Tasmil and Herman, “Penerapan Model TAM untuk Menilai Tingkat Penerimaan Nelayan Terhadap Penggunaan GPS,” J. Pekommas, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 161–170, 2015, doi: DOI: 10.30818/jpkm.2015.1180302.
G. Choi and H. Chung, “Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Social Networking Sites (SNS): Impact of Subjective Norm and Social Capital on the Acceptance of SNS,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 29, pp. 619–628, 2013, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2012.756333.
I. Aryadinata and F. Samopa, “Analysis Acceptance of Use Internet Banking and Mobile Banking, Case Study: Standart Application in XYZ Company,” IPTEK J. Procedings Ser., no. 5, pp. 465–472, 2019, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2019i5.6402.
D. Sutomo, “Pengaruh Perceived Ease Of Use, Perceived Usefulness, dan Perceived Risk Terhadap Intention To Transact Pada Toko Online di Surabaya,” Kaji. Ilm. Mhs. Manaj., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30–34, 2012.
S. Purwanto, “Memahami Niat Konsumen Menggunakan Go-Pay: Pengembangan dan Pengujian Model Penerimaan Teknologi Bagi Konsumen,” Semin. Nas. dan Call Pap. (SENIMA 3), vol. 3, 2018.
Article Metrics
Abstract View : 471 timesPDF Download : 121 times
DOI: 10.56327/jurnaltam.v12i1.1014
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.