Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Bantuan Bedah Rumah Menggunakan Metode Weight Product (WP) Dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (Studi Kasus : Desa Semuli Raya Kecamatan Abung Semuli)
(1) STMIK Surya Intan
(2) STMIK Surya Intan
(3) STMIK Surya Intan
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Semuli Raya Village in the process of selecting home renovations only relies on data collected and does not use criteria or methods, but instead uses conditions obtained from prospective recipients of house renovation assistance, so as to determine who is entitled to receive assistance the results are not in accordance with reality which exists. Citizens who have the right do not get aid as they should, whereas the rich get help. Based on the above problems, a decision support system is needed to help determine the recipient of home improvement assistance using the Weight Product (WP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods and using assessment criteria, namely, housing conditions, home status, employment, monthly income and number of occupants
Keywords
References
M. Sartika, R. Irviani, dan M. Muslihudin, “Penilaian Rumah Sehat Kabupaten Pringsewu Dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” in KNSI 2018, 2018, hal. 599–607.
F. Susanto, “Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Penilaian Indek Kinerja Karyawan Dinas Pendapatan Kabupaten Pringsewu Dengan Pendekatan Weighted Product,” vol. 01, no. 02, hal. 5–9, 2018.
F. Susanto, P. T. Informatika, L. Utara, A. Sherly, N. Sari, dan A. Salim, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Kualitas Jambu Biji Unggulan Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product,” vol. 01, no. 03, 2018.
F. Susanto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Siswa / i Lulusan Terbaik Di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri 1 Kotabumi Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process,” vol. 02, no. 01, 2019.
B. E. Turban, J. E. Aronson, dan T. Liang, Decision Support System and Intelegent System, 7th Ed. Ji. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi Yogyakarta, 2005.
E. Turban, R. Sharda, dan D. Delen, Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems. Chapter 6 Artificial Neural Networks for Data Mining, vol. 8th. 2007.
S. Kusumadewi, S. Hartati, A. Harjoko, dan Retanto Wardoyo, Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2013.
G. Muhammad Junaidi, Fiqih Satria, “Model Pengambilan Keputusan Calon Penerima Bantuan Usaha Mikro Bank Lampung Dengan Metode Weighted Product,” JTKSI, vol. 03, no. 01, hal. 20–25, 2020.
S. Kusumadewi, S. Hartati, A. Harjoko, dan Retantyo Wardoyo, “Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM),” Ed. Pertama Cetakan Pertama. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta., 2006.
A. Andoyo, M. Muslihudin, dan N. Y. Sari, “Pembuatan Model Penilaian Indeks Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making ( FMADM ) ( Studi : PTS di Provinsi Lampung ),” Pros. Semin. Nas. Darmajaya, vol. 17, no. 2, hal. 195–205, 2017.
M. Hasanudin, Y. Marli, dan B. Hendriawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process ( Studi Kasus Pada Pt . Bando Indonesia ),” SEMANASTEKNOMEDIA, vol. 6, no. 1, hal. 91–96, 2018.
S. Y. Chou, Y. H. Chang, dan C. Y. Shen, “A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., hal. 132–145, 2008.
Article Metrics
Abstract View : 518 timesPDF Download : 118 times
DOI: 10.56327/jtksi.v3i2.882
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.