Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Prioritas Pembangunan Di Desa Tekad Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS
(1) Prodi Manajeman Informatika, STMIK Surya Intan Jl. Ibrahim Syarief No.107 Kotabumi, Lampung Utara Lampung
(2) Prodi Sistem Informasi STMIK Pringsewu Lampung Jl. Wisma Rini No.09 Pringsewu, Lampung
(3) Prodi Sistem Informasi STMIK Pringsewu Lampung Jl. Wisma Rini No.09 Pringsewu, Lampung

Abstract
Development priority is a series of government policies implemented through a national development planning process that has a significant impact on the economy both at the central and regional levels. Control of achievement of development targets is used to determine which areas are priorities. The TOPSIS method is a multi criteria decision making method that has simple concepts and efficient computation and has the ability to measure the relative performance of decision alternatives in mathematical form. To make it easier to find priority areas, the method of Technique for Other Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution is used. The purpose of this research is to get a decision-making model of development priority areas using criteria based on the number of places of worship, damaged roads, roads not yet built, water tunnels, street lighting and the place of residents' activities in the Tekad Village as the central village of Pulau Panggung sub-district whose territory has opened up many new settlement areas. Of the 10 alternatives tested in this study, an alternative V2 was obtained with the lowest value of 0.244569 as a lack of infrastructure in the area so that it was declared to be a priority development area in the Tekad Village.
Keywords
References
“Undang-Undang Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 75 Tahun 2014 Tentang Percepatan penyediaan Infrastruktur Prioritas,” vol. pasal 1, p. 02.
D. Raka Ardhi Prakoso, “Komparasi Metode SAW dan TOPSIS untuk Menentukan Prioritas Perbaikan Jalan,” Tek. Elektro, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 8–11, 2016.
F. Rahman, M. T. Furqon, and N. Santoso, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Prioritas Perbaikan Jalan Menggunakan Metode AHP-TOPSIS ( Studi Kasus : Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang Kabupaten Ponorogo ),” ptiik, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 4365–4370, 2018.
K. Slamet Hidayat, Rita Irviani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Teladan Ma Al Mubarok Batu Raja Menggunakan Metode Topsis,” J. TAM ( Technol. Accept. Model ), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2016.
“Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional,” p. Pasal 1.
Panca Setyo Prihatin, “Penguatan Fungsi Badan Permusyawaratan Desa Dalam Menampung Dan Menyalurkan Aspirasi Masyarakat Desa,” WEDANA, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 123–130, 2016.
T. Noviarti, M. Muslihudin, R. Irviani, and A. Maseleno, “Optimal Dengue Endemic Region Prediction using Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting based Algorithm,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 473–478, 2018.
S. Y. Chou, Y. H. Chang, and C. Y. Shen, “A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., pp. 132–145, 2008.
A. Alinezhad, A. Amini, and A. Alinezhad, “Sensitivity analysis of simple additive weighting method (SAW): the results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of alternatives,” J. Ind. Eng., 2009.
W. Waziana, R. Irviani, I. Oktaviani, F. Satria, D. Kurniawan, and A. Maseleno, “Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting for Determination of Recipients Breeding Farm Program,” vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 93–100, 2018.
Samsudin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Kualitas Kopi Berbasis Analytical Heirarchy Process Di Pekon Batukeramat,” JTKSI, vol. 01, no. 02, pp. 35–38, 2018.
M. M. Febri Ariyanto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) Unggulan Di Wilayan Lampung Tengan Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS,” TAM, vol. 5, pp. 1–8, 2015.
Desi Leha Kurniasih, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Laptop Dengan Metode TOPSIS,” pelita Inform. budi darma, vol. III, no. 4, pp. 6–13, 2013.
R. A. Krohling and A. G. C. Pacheco, “A-TOPSIS - An approach based on TOPSIS for ranking evolutionary algorithms,” in Procedia Computer Science, 2015, vol. 55, pp. 308–317.
S. Başaran and Y. Haruna, “Integrating FAHP and TOPSIS to evaluate mobile learning applications for mathematics,” in Procedia Computer Science, 2017, vol. 120, pp. 91–98.
S. Khademolqorani and A. Z. Hamadani, “An Adjusted Decision Support System through Data Mining and Multiple Criteria Decision Making,” in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, vol. 73, pp. 388–395.
H. Ibn-Khedher and E. Abd-Elrahman, “CDNaaS Framework: TOPSIS as Multi-Criteria Decision Making for vCDN Migration,” in Procedia Computer Science, 2017, vol. 110, pp. 274–281.
Article Metrics
Abstract View

DOI: 10.56327/jtksi.v1i3.659
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.