Komparasi Multi Criteria Decision Making Method Penerimaan Bantuan Siswa Miskin

Nungsiyati Nungsiyati; Didi Susianto; Noca Yolanda Sari; Siti Mukodimah

doi:10.56327/jtksi.v6i2.1276

Komparasi Multi Criteria Decision Making Method Penerimaan Bantuan Siswa Miskin

Nungsiyati Nungsiyati⁽¹⁾, Didi Susianto⁽²⁾, Noca Yolanda Sari⁽³⁾, Siti Mukodimah⁽⁴⁾,

(1) Prodi Sistem Informasi, FTIKOM, Institut Bakti Nusantara, Lampung
(2) Prodi Sistem Informasi, FTIKOM, Institut Bakti Nusantara, Lampung
(3) Prodi Sistem Informasi, FTIKOM, Institut Bakti Nusantara, Lampung
(4) Prodi Sistem Informasi, FTIKOM, Institut Bakti Nusantara, Lampung

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Poor Student Assistance (BSM) is government assistance in the form of a sum of cash that is given directly to students who come from poor families. BSM recipients are students who have been determined by the Ministry of Education and Culture (Kemdikbud) based on a predetermined mechanism. Assistance provided by the government to students from underprivileged families is not transparent so some BSM are not on target. In an effort to minimize target inaccuracies, a study was made with Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) which is a decision-making method for determining the best alternative out of a number of alternatives based on certain criteria. The ranking of beneficiaries is determined using a comparison of the Simple Additive Weighting Method and the Weighted Product Method, which are the MCDM model. Manual testing was carried out on 5 (five). From the test results of the Simple Additive Weighting Method, Alternative 4 obtained the highest score. While the results of the Weighted Product method test show the highest results in Alternative 3. The difference in the calculation results of the two methods used is influenced by several factors such as the performance rating value of each alternative, the weight of the criteria, and mathematical calculations for each method, and because the criteria used do not have different weights so that the calculation results become less significant.

Keywords

Decision Making System, Assistance for Poor Students, Simple Additive Weighting, Weighted Product

References

M. Muslihudin, R. Fitri Andriyanti, S. Mukodimah, P. Sistem Informasi, and S. Pringsewu Lampung, “Implementasi Metode Weighted Product Menentukan Beasiswa Bidik Misi Stmik Pringsewu,” Jatisi, vol. 4, no. 2, 2018.

A. Wanto and H. Damanik, “Analisis Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Terhadap Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa BBM (Bantuan Belajar Mahasiswa) Pada Perguruan Tiakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)nggi Menggun,” in Seminar Nasional Rekayasa (SNTR) II, 2015.

M. Muslihudin and D. Hartini, “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Pengambilan Keputusan Untuk Penerimaan Beasiswa Di SMA PGRI 1 Talang Padang Dengan Model Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J. TAM ( Technol. Accept. Model ), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2015.

E. Turban, J. E. Aronson, and T.-P. Liang, Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 7th ed. Prentice Hall, 2004.

B. E. Turban, J. E. Aronson, and T. Liang, Decision Support System and Intelegent System, 7th Ed. Ji. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi Yogyakarta, 2005.

E. Turban, J. E. Aronson, and T.-P. Liang, “Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems,” Decis. Support Syst. Intell. Syst., vol. 7, p. 867, 2007.

M. Muslihudin and A. W. Arumita, “Pembuatan Model Penilaian Proses Belajar Mengajar Perguruan Tinggi Menggunakan Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ) ( Sudi : STMIK Pringsewu ),” in SEMANASTEKNOMEDIA, 2016, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 4.11-31.

L. Muhamad Muslihudin, “Implementasi Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Untuk Diagnosa Awal Gangguan Pada Masa Kehamilan,” in KNSI 2016, 2016, pp. 11–13.

M. M. Andino Maseleno, K. Shankar, Miftachul Huda, Marini Othman, Prayugo Khoir, “CEL : Citizen Economic Level using SAW,” in Expert Systems in Finance: Smart Financial Applications in Big Data Environments, no. February, 2019, pp. 97–111.

S. M. Muhamad Muslihudin, Fauzi, Satria Abadi, Trisnawati, Implementasi Konsep Decision Support System & Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (Fmadm). Bandung: Penerbit Adab, 2021.

S. Kusumadewi, S. Hartati, A. Harjoko, and Retantyo Wardoyo, “Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM),” Ed. Pertama Cetakan Pertama. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta., 2006.

J. R. S. C. Mateo, “Weighted sum method and weighted product method,” in Green Energy and Technology, 2012, vol. 83, pp. 19–22.

J. Y. Pak, V. V. Thai, and G. T. Yeo, “Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Evaluating Intangible Resources Affecting Port Service Quality,” Asian J. Shipp. Logist., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 459–468, 2015.

S. Khademolqorani and A. Z. Hamadani, “An Adjusted Decision Support System through Data Mining and Multiple Criteria Decision Making,” in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, vol. 73, pp. 388–395.

Full Text: PDF